About Me

Name: cavalier973
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Anarcho-Capitalism: It's the American Way

 
A very good article I just found the other day.  The "Wild West" turns out to be not so very wild; and people tended to work out their society just fine without a government overseer there to make sure they didn't kill and rob each other.
Tags: liberty  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A better tax system for Mississippi

In Mississippi, we have a combination income tax and sales tax.  Now, on a national level, I support the Fair Tax as a better alternative to the current mess we have (www.fairtax.org).  States could adopt a version of the Fair Tax, as Missouri has done recently.  Mississippi could follow suit, and I believe it would be an improvement over how the government is currently funded.  But I think there is a better way, still, for Mississippi to tax its citizens, as the Fair Tax shares a problem with all other tax systems proposed and implement to date: it is still involuntary.  "That's silly," one might rightly claim.  "How can any tax be voluntary?  Who would pay it?"
 
Well, I got this interesting idea from listening to Rush Limbaugh the other day.  He stated that he likes lotteries because they are taxes he doesn't have to pay.  So, I propose that Mississippi's government fund itself through a series of voluntary, ad hoc lotteries.  This would, of course, completely replace the income/sales tax scheme currently in force. The "tax lottery" would work thusly: the state legislature decides to build a bridge near Melonsquashville.  It puts the project out for bid, and the winning bid amount becomes the basis for the new lottery. Say the winning bid is $100 million; a certain amount, say 30% (or $30 million in this case) is added to the bid amount for the lottery winnings.  People then are able to buy lottery tickets for the "Melonsquashville Bridge Lottery".  No money is spent on the project, and no winnings are paid out until the project is fully funded.  If the project is not fully funded, the legislature can pay out the winnings, holding the remaining funds in a trust fund while a second lottery is implemented to make up the balance.  Or, the state could simply extend the date, while increasing the winning amount.  Or, the state could simply cancel the project altogether and pay out all the money.
 
Ongoing funding projects (universities, state highway patrol, paying interest on bond issues) would have continual lotteries, paying out weekly or monthly.
 
The appeal of this plan (I hope) is three fold: first, the tax is voluntary--no one is going to jail for "tax avoidance"; second, the ad hoc nature of the "tax" puts a limit on government spending, and allows the "taxpayer" to know exactly where his money is going; third, the lottery aspect acts as an incentive for people to "pay their taxes."
 
I invite criticism and comments.
Tags: Taxes  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I'd clap, too

 

Writes Tom White:

I went to Philadelphia with my nine-year-old daughter and visited the Liberty Bell, Franklin Court, Betsy Ross home, and finally Independence Hall. After the usual bag checks*, we waited in line to enter the old Pennsylvania State House. They allow a group of thirty or so in at a time, escorted by a park ranger. We gathered in a room before the tour started. The park ranger begins to tell us about the Continental Congress gathering to “fix” the Articles of Confederation. He starts by saying “There were four main problems with the Articles of Confederation. First, it gave the new country no authority to establish an army. Second, it had no power to make treaties with foreign governments. Third, they were unable to print money. Finally, they could not raise and collect taxes.” At this, some in the crowd began to clap. The ranger made some comment about April 15th might make some feel this way.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tennessee calling on her sister states to restore the Constitution

This is heartening:
 
 

They Can’t Push Us Around Forever

Posted on 20 October 2009

by State Rep. Susan Lynn (TN-57th)

The following is a letter from Tennessee to the other 49 State Legislatures

We send greetings from the Tennessee General Assembly.  On June 23, 2009, House Joint Resolution 108, the State Sovereignty Resolution, was signed by Governor Phil Bredesen.  The Resolution created a committee which has as its charge to:

  • Communicate the resolution to the legislatures of the several states,
  • Assure them that this State continues in the same esteem of their friendship,
  • Call for a joint working group between the states to enumerate the abuses of authority by the federal government, and
  • Seek repeal of the assumption of powers and the imposed mandates.

It is for those purposes that this letter addresses your honorable body.

In 1776, our founding fathers declared our freedom in the magnificent Declaration of Independence; our guide to governance.  They established a nation of free and independent states.  Declaring that the purpose of our political system is to secure for its citizens’ their natural rights.  The Constitution authorizes the national government to carry out seventeen enumerated powers in Article 1, Section 8 and the powers of several of the ensuing amendments.

At the time of the Constitutional ratification process James Madison drafted the “Virginia Plan” to give Congress general legislative authority and to empower the national judiciary to hear any case that might cause friction among the states, to give the congress a veto over state laws, to empower the national government to use the military against the states, and to eliminate the states’ accustomed role in selecting members of Congress.  Each one of these proposals was soundly defeated.  In fact, Madison made many more attempts to authorize a national veto over state laws, and these were repeatedly defeated as well.

There are clear limits to the power of the federal government and clear realms of power for the states.  However, the simple and clear expression of purpose, to secure our natural rights, has evolved into the modern expectation that the national government has an obligation to ensure our life, to create our liberty, and fund our pursuit of happiness.

The national government has become a complex system of programs whose purposes lie outside of the responsibilities of the enumerated powers and of securing our natural rights; programs that benefit some while others must pay.

Today, the federal government seeks to control the salaries of those employed by private business, to change the provisions of private of contracts, to nationalize banks, insurers and auto manufacturers, and to dictate to every person in the land what his or her medical choices will be.

Forcing property from employers to provide healthcare, legislating what individuals are and are not entitled to, and using the labor of some so that others can receive money that they did not earn goes far beyond securing natural rights, and the enumerated powers in the Constitution.

The role of our American government has been blurred, bent, and breached. The rights endowed to us by our creator must be restored.

To be sure, the People created the federal government to be their agent for certain enumerated purposes only.  The Constitutional ratifying structure was created so it would be clear that it was the People, and not the States, that were doing the ratifying.

The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that which has been delegated by the people to the federal government, and also that which is absolutely necessary to advancing those powers specifically enumerated in the Constitution of the United States.  The rest is to be handled by the state governments, or locally, by the people themselves.

The Constitution does not include a congressional power to override state laws.  It does not give the judicial branch unlimited jurisdiction over all matters.  It does not provide Congress with the power to legislate over everything. This is verified by the simple fact that attempts to make these principles part of the Constitution were soundly rejected by its signers.

With this in mind, any federal attempt to legislate beyond the Constitutional limits of Congress’ authority is a usurpation of state sovereignty - and unconstitutional.

Governments and political leaders are best held accountable to the will of the people when government is local. The people of a state know what is best for them; authorities, potentially thousands of miles away, governing their lives is opposed to the very notion of freedom.

We invite your state to join with us to form a joint working group between the states to enumerate the abuses of authority by the federal government and to seek repeal of the assumption of powers and the imposed mandates.

Susan Lynn [send her email] is a member of the Tennessee General Assembly; serving on the Commerce Committee and Chairman of the Government Operations committee. She holds a BS in economics and a minor in history. She is the Chairman of the American Legislative Exchange Council’s Commerce Task Force.  Visit her blog at http://susan-lynn.blogspot.com

Tags: liberty  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BBC reports that man-made "Global Warming" may not be true

 
They still try to defend the conventional wisdom that man-made global warming is scientifically verifiable.  I find the argument about the ocean temperatures more persuasive (meaning that we are on the cusp of a 30 year global cooling trend).
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Limbaugh wants to "saw off Maine"

Just a few minutes ago, Rush Limbaugh stated that to deal with the problem of Olympia Snowe, we should "saw off Maine" from the rest of the country.  My question is, why should Maine get the benefit of no longer living under this oppresive central government?  If we were able to "saw off Maine", it would become a destination of choice for millions of Americans, I think....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Articles of Confederation

http://mises.org/story/1296
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »