About Me

Name: cavalier973
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Want to lower health care costs? Pay for it yourself

 
This reminds me of the lady who called Rush Limbaugh and told how she shopped around and got an X-Ray for $20 that was originally going to cost $269.



http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/foye7.1.1.html


Obama, I Got Your Health Savings Right Here

by James Foye




Politicians never tire of telling us of how this or that plan will save us money, when, invariably, they always cost more than predicted and never save anybody anything.

Left to their own devices, consumers of health care, like consumers of any other good, will figure out how to save money just fine on their own. Here’s an example:

One day a few weeks ago I realized that what I thought was an insect bite on my chest was probably some kind of infection. On a Sunday afternoon I went to a local clinic and within 15 minutes was seeing a doctor. Sure enough, the doc diagnosed it as a staph infection, drained it, and put me on a prescription of antibiotics. For the office visit I was charged $175.00, not bad considering it was Sunday, and I received excellent care with almost no waiting. I paid another $15 to fulfill the prescription (generic, of course).

During the examination the doc took a sample of the discharge and said something about sending it to the lab. A short time after I returned home a nurse from the clinic called me. Did I want to send this on to the lab? There would be an extra cost. How much, I asked? She wasn’t sure, but she would call the lab on Monday and find out. And then she added something:

"To be honest, it’s not really going to make a difference what it is. If you don’t respond to the antibiotics, the doctor will just have to put you on something stronger."

The next day she called me back with the cost: $210. Despite some urging from family members (all of whom, unlike myself, have health insurance), I told the nurse not to send it to the lab.

What do you think just about any other person covered by health insurance would have done? But I pay for my own medical care, and I did a cost benefit analysis, and decided that money would be better off staying with me.

Savings: $210.

Several days later I decided to follow up with the family doctor, as the spot, while it had stopped getting bigger, was not getting appreciably smaller. The doctor said everything looked good, it just takes a while to heal. He drained it a bit more, and then he told me to wash twice a day for a week with Hibiclens (that pink soap you always see surgeons scrubbing with prior to an operation), plus put some antibiotic ointment up my nose.

On the way out I paid my bill. The normal fee would be $130. But since I pay in cash, I received a 30% discount, making the final bill only $91. You see, like most doctors’ offices, my family doctor is forced to have people on staff who do nothing put process insurance forms all day. And after he sees a patient, he typically waits 60–90 days (or longer, even) to get paid. I’m doing him a favor by paying him today, and he’s doing me a favor by charging me closer to what a doctor’s visit should actually cost.

Savings: $39.

At the pharmacy I found that the surgical soap was pretty cheap (about $12), but that the antibiotic ointment was $40. At that point I remembered that my previous family doctor had prescribed some antibiotic ointment for me a couple of years ago, for an inflamed hair follicle right just inside one of my nostrils. (Excuse all the gory medical details here in this essay). I knew I still had almost an entire tube of that stuff at home, so I held off on buying it. When I got home, I saw that the name of the one I had was not what the doctor had prescribed. But I called his office and told him what I had, and he said it works just as well, so I could use it.

Savings: $40.

Let’s add it all up:

Item

Cost

First doctor’s visit

175

Antibiotics (generic)

15

Second doctor’s visit

91

Hibiclens soap

12

Total cost for treating my staph infection: $293.

Here’s what I didn’t spend, but would have been part of the cost if I was on health insurance.

Item

Cost

Lab analysis

210

Doctor’s visit (reverse cash discount)

39

Antibiotic ointment

40

$289, or just $4 short of what I actually spent. A savings of 49.5%! No bureaucrat can match that. No central planner can produce that by waving his wand and making his sweeping pronouncement, "I decree this is how much will be saved!" Savings happen when people spend their own money, and so they care how much of it they spend. When spending other peoples’ money, it is human nature to spend more.

September 19, 2009

James Foye [send him mail] is an independent software developer living in Austin, Texas.

Copyright © 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On Limbaugh's show today (concerning Health Care)

 
Sherry in, what is that, Aledo, Texas.

CALLER: Aledo, Texas.

RUSH: Aledo, Texas. Well, I'm sorry I mispronounced it. It's the first time I've seen it.

CALLER: That's quite all right. I was calling to suggest that the high insurance costs and health care costs are not entirely due to the insurance companies but also the health providers because they don't post what they charge things. I went in for an X-ray yesterday, and the place the doctor sent me to was going to cost me $269.

RUSH: Wait, wait, wait. For an X-ray?

CALLER: For an X-ray.

RUSH: Of what?

CALLER: My toe.

RUSH: So $269 for a toe X-ray. Okay.

CALLER: So I said, "Is that the best you can do, because that seems a little high."

RUSH: Wait a minute. You have insurance?

CALLER: Well, that's what they asked me and I said, "Yes," and they're like, "Okay, never mind." But regardless, I want to know what it's going to cost. So she did get it down to $221, and that still seemed awfully high so I left, and I went home and I called around and I found a place that would do it for $80 but there would also be a charge for the radiologist to read it but she couldn't tell me how much that was, and referred me to billing. Of course I had to leave a message for billing and they never called me back, but I did finally find a place that would do it for $20.

RUSH: Paying for it yourself, no insurance?

CALLER: Yes.

RUSH: See?

CALLER: See.

RUSH: See? Now, that's a good deal. So your original price was $289 did you say?

CALLER: It was $269.

RUSH: It was $269 and you got it whittled down to $221, and then $80 but you didn't know what the radiologist would charge to read it and finally got it down to $20.

CALLER: Twenty dollars.

RUSH: Paying for it yourself.

CALLER: Paying for it myself.

RUSH: Didn't need your insurance.

CALLER: But, you know, all the places that I asked how much is this going to cost, nobody knew, nobody could tell me. They had to refer me to somebody else, who didn't call me back.

RUSH: Right, because it doesn't matter because some third party is going to pay it, not you, and there's a formula, that's why they don't know because it's not up to them. There's some formula based on whether the insurance company or whoever it is tells them what it's worth and what they're going to reimburse them for. That's why if you do go into places -- you ought to try this, folks, just a standard doctor visit, offer to pay for it yourself, I guarantee you it will cost you lest than if you use your insurance. And there's no deductible, there's no copay, you just pay it. Try it, see if it works. It worked obviously here for Sherry in Aledo, Texas.

CALLER: I had another question. When insurance is nationalized where do all the people go who work for insurance companies?

RUSH: They are unemployed.

CALLER: Yeah. So that's really going to be good for the country.

RUSH: Yeah. That's more crisis for Obama. It's more uninsured. They'll have to go on the government option. It's insidious. Do you think he cares about unemployment now? Anybody running this country in this current economic situation would be devastated, personally devastated over what circumstances the American people are in today, particularly the unemployed and they would be doing something to reverse it. Zip, zero, nada. Stimulus isn't gonna work anyway. Six percent is what's been spent. They're saving the rest of it for 2010, a reelection year. And, by the way, it was in the stack yesterday. I think it's a Washington Post story, maybe, I'm not sure. It was a story about infrastructure spending down in some big city, and that was the whole point of the stimulus was shovel-ready infrastructure jobs. Anybody with a heart, any president of the United States with a heart would look at this economic mess and would not be doing this, would not have policies anywhere like this, would not be thinking of a health care plan like this and all this borrowing. Folks, this is serious. This is a president working outside the political system of this country to overthrow it.


END TRANSCRIPT
Tags: health care  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »